Sunday, December 9, 2012

Is Racism Influencing the Immigration Debate?



By: Amy Ketner

Racism and immigration reform are often not blatantly named in the same sentence, although they are dangerously tangled.  One article in Time U.S. addresses the two issues together though and notes the importance of doing so.  Although this article is over six years old, it could be republished today and the issues would still be relevant.


The author, Massimo Calabresi, explicitly acknowledges the ways in which racist thinking influences immigration laws.  Racist scholars and politicians, as well as a racist public, push for stricter laws that will seal the border and push out Hispanics and Latin@s.  While there are ways to mask this discussion and make it seem more about employment and other statistics and demographics, for many people immigration is simply a matter of keeping non-whites out of the country, perpetuating a racial dictatorship.*

Calabresi discusses a comment of one Fox News member, John Gibson, in which he implores white people to have more babies because soon the minorities will be a majority.  Not only does Calabresi discuss the statistical inaccuracy of this comment, but also the meaning of it.  There is a clear sense of fear in his statement.  Heaven forbid that there are more minorities in this country than the white majority.  If this happens, it is more likely that whites will lose pieces of their white power.  Perhaps Gibson and others like him feel as if this is another small step closer to becoming the oppressed rather than the oppressor.  Perhaps he feels that if enough people from Mexico and Latin American countries enter the US that it will no longer be a country ran by those who were born and raised here, by those who are like him.  The country his grandchildren are born into could look significantly different than that into which he was born.  It seems as this is a scary concept for Gibson and many others like him. 

This is a mentality that frequently plays into immigration debates, though perhaps not commonly as explicitly or crudely as Gibson’s encouragement of white procreation.  This is an example of how racism is transforming over time.  In this post-Civil-Rights era we are often fooled to think that because we are not shackling people of a certain color into slavery or labeling water fountains as white or colored, we are being progressive and beyond issues of racism. 

Racism still permeates society.  It exists.  It is powerful.

Discussions of immigration reform are a platform for these racist tendencies to shine their brightest.  Some Americans state that they don’t want Latin@ immigrants in the US because they will steal our jobs.  Translation: we fear “the other”.  Some say that Hispanics and Latin@s bring drugs and gangs and violence.  Translation: Hispanics and Latin@s are criminals and immoral.  Those who say these things do not consider socioeconomic status, nor the roles that the US has in this lack of employment in other countries.  They forget the role Americans have in drugs, violence and gang activity that a few immigrants participate in.  The immigrants become the scapegoated other, and therefore the feared other.  ‘Immigrants as the other’ becomes ‘Hispanics and Latin@s as the other’.  This was demonstrated in our survey when participants responded that “Mexican” and “Hispanic” came to mind when thinking of the word illegal. 

Racism is a significant factor in the immigration debates, yet one we somehow manage to not acknowledge.  Calabresi is not afraid to name this racism and, with reason, urges us to openly talk about this fact.  We cannot let this racism persist in such a huge issue that affects millions of families.  We cannot let white power (and white fear) continue to control this entire system that is changing the face of our country.

Works Cited:
Michael Omi and Howard Winant. “Racial Formation,” Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge, 1994. 53-76.

No comments:

Post a Comment